Overview

Campanile Nancy Ouest - Laxou

Site Techno Parc Saint Jacques, 54320 Maxeville, Lorraine, France
+33 3 83 98 64 64

$54+

Overall guest ratings

6.8/10 Good
Based on 1,192 reviews

Review highlights

  • 7.6
  • 7.5
  • 4.1
  • 3.7

Nearby

    Show all

    About

    Campanile Nancy Laxou puts you 2.7 mi (4.4 km) from Musee de l'Ecole de Nancy and 2.8 mi (4.5 km) from Musee des Beaux-arts. For a bite to eat, guests can check out Le Restaurant, which serves French cuisine and is open for breakfast, lunch, and dinner. A bar/lounge and a terrace are other highlights, and rooms offer LCD TVs and premium bedding.

    Less More
    Hotels.com

    Amenities

    • Free Wi-Fi
    • Pets allowed on request. Charges may apply.
    • Facilities for Disabled Guests
    • Internet
    • Meeting/Banquet facilities
    • Game room
    • No smoking
    • Restaurant
    • Express check out
    • Air-conditioned
    • Free parking
    • Terrace/Patio
    • Bar/Lounge
    • Designated smoking area
    Less More
    Reviews

    Guest reviews

    Overall Rating

    6.8 Good
    Based on 1,192 reviews
    • 7.6 "Good location."
      8.1 "Easily accessible by car, said 81%."
      8.9 "Great parking, according to 89%."
    • 7.5 "Good breakfast."
    • 6.9 "Service is ok."
    • 5.3 "Average comfort."
      5.2 "For only 52%, the noise level was all right."
      6.5 "Only 65% said rooms were big enough."
    • 5.2 "Average cleanliness."
      5.1 "Only 51% said rooms were clean enough."
      6.4 "64% thought the cleanliness of the hotel was average."
    • 4.1 "Rooms are not good."
      2.3 "77% complained about the bathroom."
      0.1 "99% thought they were poorly maintained."
      0.4 "Air conditioning was criticized by 96%."
      0.3 "For 97%, the rooms looked old."
      0.6 "94% said the bathroom was dirty."
      0.8 "92% found problems with the furniture."
      0.0 "100% thought the tv was sub-standard."
    • 3.7 "Internet is poor."
      3.2 "68% said the wifi quality was bad."
    • 3.5 "Bad amenities."
      3.2 "68% thought the building wasn't nice."
      0.0 "100% thought the facilities needed updating."
      1.0 "90% didn't like the architecture."
    • 0.5 "Horrible vibe."
      0.2 "98% criticized the unstylish hotel."
      0.6 "94% didn't like the unstylish hotel."
    View all review categories

    Overall Rating

    6.8 Good
    Based on 786 reviews
    • 7.9 "Good location."
      8.1 "Easily accessible by car, said 81%."
      8.8 "Great parking, according to 88%."
    • 7.4 "Good breakfast."
    • 6.7 "Service is ok."
    • 5.4 "Average comfort."
      5.5 "For only 55%, the noise level was all right."
      6.5 "Only 65% said rooms were big enough."
    • 5.0 "Average cleanliness."
      6.3 "63% thought the cleanliness of the hotel was average."
    • 4.1 "Internet is poor."
    • 4.0 "Rooms are not good."
      2.2 "78% complained about the bathroom."
      5.0 "Only 50% said rooms were clean enough."
      0.1 "99% thought they were poorly maintained."
      0.5 "Air conditioning was criticized by 95%."
      0.3 "For 97%, the rooms looked old."
      0.8 "92% said the bathroom was dirty."
      0.6 "94% found problems with the furniture."
    • 3.3 "Bad amenities."
      3.2 "68% thought the building wasn't nice."
      0.0 "100% thought the facilities needed updating."
    • 0.4 "Horrible vibe."
      0.1 "99% criticized the unstylish hotel."
    View all review categories

    Overall Rating

    7.2 Good
    Based on 178 reviews
    • 7.7 "Good location."
      8.3 "Easily accessible by car, said 83%."
    • 7.4 "Good breakfast."
    • 7.1 "Good service."
      7.9 "79% found the staff to be very friendly."
      7.8 "78% said the reception staff was great."
    • 5.6 "Average cleanliness."
      5.6 "Only 56% said rooms were clean enough."
    • 5.1 "Average comfort."
      5.1 "For only 51%, the noise level was all right."
    • 4.2 "Rooms are not good."
      0.3 "Air conditioning was criticized by 97%."
      2.3 "77% complained about the bathroom."
      0.1 "99% thought they were poorly maintained."
    • 3.3 "Bad amenities."
      3.1 "69% thought the building wasn't nice."
    • 0.6 "Horrible vibe."
      0.1 "99% criticized the unstylish hotel."
    View all review categories

    Overall Rating

    5.8 Okay
    Based on 11 reviews
    • 3.6 "Rooms are not good."

    Overall Rating

    6.9 Good
    Based on 214 reviews
    • 7.9 "Good breakfast."
    • 7.0 "Good location."
    • 6.9 "Service is ok."
    • 6.4 "Food is average."
      6.1 "Only 61% were satisfied with the menu."
    • 5.5 "Average comfort."
      6.9 "Only 69% said rooms were big enough."
    • 4.4 "Not very clean."
      4.3 "57% said rooms were dirty."
    • 3.8 "Rooms are not good."
      2.2 "78% complained about the bathroom."
      4.3 "57% said rooms were dirty."
      0.3 "For 97%, the rooms looked old."
      0.1 "99% thought they were poorly maintained."
    • 3.8 "Internet is poor."
      3.2 "68% said the wifi quality was bad."
    • 0.5 "Horrible vibe."
      0.1 "99% criticized the unstylish hotel."
    View all review categories
    Hotel type
    Solo Hotel
    Guests recommend this hotel for solo travelers.
    data provided by TrustYou

    Photos
    Map

    Map

    Close