Overview

Royal Garden Inn

33 Tongguiqiao, Shantang Street, Jiansu, Suzhou 215008, China
+86 512 6296 9258

Call

+86 512 6296 9258

Overall guest ratings

7.2/10 Good
Based on 602 reviews

Review highlights

  • 9.5
  • 9.1
  • 4.0
  • 3.6

Good to know

  • Great view

Nearby

    Show all

    About

    Royal Garden Inn offers an airport shuttle (available on request) for CNY 550 per vehicle one way. For a bite to eat, guests can check out Shangpin Restaurant, one of 2 restaurants, which serves breakfast, lunch, and dinner. Rooms offer up nice touches like rainfall showerheads, slippers, and comfy beds with premium linens.

    More hotel details about Royal Garden Inn

    Royal Garden Inn Prices:

    $0 - $0 (Based on average prices for a Standard Room)

    Royal Garden Inn Rooms:

    48 rooms

    Other names used to reference this hotel:

    • Royal Garden Inn Suzhou
    • Royal Garden Inn Suzhou Jiangsu
    • Royal Garden Inn SHA
    • Royal Garden Inn Hotel
    • Royal Garden Inn Hotel Suzhou
    • Royal Garden Inn Hotel SHA
    • Royal Garden Inn Hotel SZV
    • Royal Garden Inn Hotel Suzhou (SZV)
    Less More
    Hotels.com

    Amenities

    • Non-smoking rooms available
    Less More
    Reviews

    Guest reviews of Royal Garden Inn

    Overall Rating

    7.2 Good
    Based on 602 reviews
    • 9.5 "Terrific location."
      9.5 "Easily accessible by car, said 95%."
      9.7 "Near to public transport, according to 97%."
      10.0 "100% liked the proximity to sightseeing."
      10.0 "100% thought it was easy to get to the train station."
      10.0 "100% enjoyed the restaurants & bars nearby."
    • 9.1 "Incredible bar."
    • 6.0 "Service is ok."
      6.4 "Only 64% found the staff to be friendly enough."
      5.8 "58% said the reception staff was ok."
      5.8 "Only 58% thought the service was professional."
    • 5.9 "Vibe was decent."
      5.5 "55% considered the lobby entrance to be so-so."
    • 4.0 "Value below average."
    • 3.6 "Internet is poor."
      2.6 "74% said the wifi quality was bad."
    • 3.3 "Rooms are not good."
      1.8 "82% complained about the bathroom."
      2.4 "76% said rooms were small."
      1.0 "90% said rooms were dirty."
      0.4 "96% thought they were poorly maintained."
      3.2 "68% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      0.0 "For 100%, the rooms looked old."
      0.4 "96% criticized the small bathroom."
      2.5 "Air conditioning was criticized by 75%."
      1.3 "87% found problems with the furniture."
      0.0 "100% said the bathroom was dirty."
      2.0 "80% had problems with the shower."
      0.7 "93% thought the tv was sub-standard."
    • 3.1 "Terrible amenities."
      3.1 "69% thought the building wasn't nice."
      0.4 "96% thought the facilities needed updating."
    • 2.8 "Quite uncomfortable."
      2.4 "76% said rooms were small."
      3.2 "68% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      3.6 "64% thought it was too noisy."
      0.4 "96% criticized the small bathroom."
      2.5 "Air conditioning was criticized by 75%."
    View all review categories

    Overall Rating

    7.4 Good
    Based on 246 reviews
    • 9.6 "Terrific location."
      9.6 "Easily accessible by car, said 96%."
    • 5.9 "Service is ok."
    • 5.6 "Vibe was decent."
    • 4.2 "Value below average."
    • 3.7 "Internet is poor."
      2.8 "72% said the wifi quality was bad."
    • 3.4 "Rooms are not good."
      1.7 "83% complained about the bathroom."
      0.9 "91% said rooms were dirty."
      2.0 "80% said rooms were small."
      0.8 "92% thought they were poorly maintained."
    • 2.9 "Terrible amenities."
      3.0 "70% thought the building wasn't nice."
      0.6 "94% thought the facilities needed updating."
    • 2.5 "Quite uncomfortable."
      2.0 "80% said rooms were small."
    View all review categories

    Overall Rating

    7.1 Good
    Based on 198 reviews
    • 9.5 "Terrific location."
      9.5 "Near to public transport, according to 95%."
      9.6 "Easily accessible by car, said 96%."
    • 6.2 "Service is ok."
    • 5.8 "Vibe was decent."
    • 4.3 "Value below average."
    • 2.9 "Awful rooms."
      1.1 "89% said rooms were dirty."
      2.3 "77% said rooms were small."
      1.6 "84% complained about the bathroom."
    • 2.8 "Terrible amenities."
      2.8 "72% thought the building wasn't nice."
    • 2.8 "Quite uncomfortable."
      2.3 "77% said rooms were small."
      3.7 "63% thought it was too noisy."
    • 1.3 "Generally quite dirty."
      1.1 "89% said rooms were dirty."
    View all review categories

    Overall Rating

    8.2 Excellent
    Based on 66 reviews
    • 9.6 "Terrific location."
    • 6.1 "Vibe was decent."
    • 5.9 "Service is ok."
    • 3.6 "Bad amenities."
      3.7 "63% thought the building wasn't nice."
    • 3.1 "Awful rooms."

    Overall Rating

    7.0 Good
    Based on 90 reviews
    • 9.6 "Terrific location."
    • 5.3 "Vibe was decent."
    • 3.8 "Value below average."
    • 3.0 "Terrible amenities."
      3.1 "69% thought the building wasn't nice."
    • 2.8 "Awful rooms."
      2.2 "78% complained about the bathroom."
      0.8 "92% said rooms were dirty."
    • 2.4 "Quite uncomfortable."
    • 1.1 "Generally quite dirty."
      0.8 "92% said rooms were dirty."
    View all review categories
    Hotel type
    Friends Hotel
    Guests recommend this for traveling with friends.
    Good to know
    "Great view"
    data provided by TrustYou

    Photos
    Map

    Map