Overview

Royal King Residence Hotel

39, South Xueyuan Road, Beijing 0, Beijing 100081, China
+86 106 228 9999

$49+

Overall guest ratings

8.1/10 Excellent
Based on 1,013 reviews

Review highlights

  • 9.3
  • 5.5
  • 4.6
  • 3.9

Good to know

  • Good accessibility by car
  • Friendly atmosphere

Nearby

    Show all

    About

    The Royal King Residence Hotel (Rongjinzhongcai Dajiudian) is close to Beijing Zoo and the Central University of Finance & Economics. This Beijing hotel's Hong Kong style restaurant deluxe lobby bar and café offer a range of dining and drinking options. This hotel provides one business center and several conference rooms. For relaxation guests can go to the beauty salon or shoot some pool.

    More hotel details about Royal King Residence Hotel

    Royal King Residence Hotel Prices:

    $49 - $56 (Based on average prices for a Standard Room)

    Royal King Residence Hotel Rooms:

    224 rooms

    Other names used to reference this hotel:

    • Royal King Residence Hotel Beijing
    Less More
    CtripApac
    Reviews

    Guest reviews of Royal King Residence Hotel

    Overall Rating

    8.1 Excellent
    Based on 1,013 reviews
    • 9.3 "Terrific location."
      9.5 "Easily accessible by car, said 95%."
      8.9 "Near to public transport, according to 89%."
      7.0 "Great parking, according to 70%."
      10.0 "100% liked the proximity to shopping."
    • 5.5 "Service is ok."
      6.7 "Housekeeping was ok, according to 67%."
      5.7 "57% thought the management was tolerable."
    • 5.3 "Vibe was decent."
    • 4.6 "Rooms are not good."
      3.9 "61% said rooms were small."
      2.5 "75% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      4.7 "53% complained about the bathroom."
      0.0 "For 100%, the rooms looked old."
      0.4 "96% thought they were poorly maintained."
      1.8 "Air conditioning was criticized by 82%."
      0.3 "97% were unsatisfied with the kitchenette."
      1.4 "86% found problems with the furniture."
      1.0 "90% thought the tv was sub-standard."
    • 3.9 "Not very comfortable."
      3.9 "61% said rooms were small."
      2.5 "75% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      1.8 "Air conditioning was criticized by 82%."
    • 3.7 "Bad amenities."
      3.7 "63% thought the building wasn't nice."
      0.3 "97% thought the facilities needed updating."
    • 3.4 "Breakfast is below average."
    • 2.8 "Disappointing internet connection."
      3.0 "70% said the wifi quality was bad."
      1.4 "86% thought it was overpriced."
    View all review categories

    Overall Rating

    9.1 Excellent
    Based on 10 reviews
    • 4.6 "Rooms are not good."

    Overall Rating

    8.2 Excellent
    Based on 101 reviews
    • 9.4 "Terrific location."
      9.4 "Easily accessible by car, said 94%."
    • 5.5 "Service is ok."
    • 4.7 "Rooms are not good."
      4.4 "56% said rooms were small."
    • 4.7 "Vibe wasn't good."
      0.2 "98% criticized the unstylish hotel."
    • 4.2 "Not very comfortable."
      4.4 "56% said rooms were small."
    • 3.7 "Bad amenities."
      3.6 "64% thought the building wasn't nice."
      0.3 "97% thought the facilities needed updating."

    Overall Rating

    8.1 Excellent
    Based on 769 reviews
    • 9.4 "Terrific location."
      9.4 "Easily accessible by car, said 94%."
    • 7.5 "High value."
    • 5.7 "Service is ok."
    • 5.4 "Vibe was decent."
    • 4.9 "Rooms are not good."
      4.1 "59% said rooms were small."
      2.4 "76% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
    • 4.2 "Not very comfortable."
      4.1 "59% said rooms were small."
      2.4 "76% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
    • 3.4 "Breakfast is below average."
    • 3.4 "Bad amenities."
      3.3 "67% thought the building wasn't nice."
      0.2 "98% thought the facilities needed updating."
    • 2.8 "Disappointing internet connection."
      3.1 "69% said the wifi quality was bad."
    View all review categories

    Overall Rating

    7.9 Good
    Based on 131 reviews
    • 9.1 "Terrific location."
    • 5.6 "Service is ok."
    • 4.9 "Vibe wasn't good."
      0.2 "98% criticized the unstylish hotel."
    • 4.2 "Rooms are not good."
      3.5 "65% said rooms were small."
      2.3 "77% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      4.5 "55% complained about the bathroom."
    • 3.5 "Bad amenities."
      3.5 "65% thought the building wasn't nice."
      0.3 "97% thought the facilities needed updating."
    • 3.5 "Not very comfortable."
      3.5 "65% said rooms were small."
      2.3 "77% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
    • 2.8 "Disappointing internet connection."
      3.0 "70% said the wifi quality was bad."
    View all review categories
    Good to know
    "Good accessibility by car"
    "Friendly atmosphere"
    data provided by TrustYou

    Recent reviews

    Find reviews that mention:

    Map

    Map