Hotel Carrobbio, Milan Hotels from $74

Guest reviews

Based on 1,099 reviews

Location

9.1 "Terrific location."

10.0 "100% liked the proximity to sightseeing."

10.0 "100% liked the proximity to shopping."

10.0 "City centre within easy reach, said 100%."

8.4 "Near to public transport, according to 84%."

10.0 "100% enjoyed the restaurants & bars nearby."

8.9 "89% thought it was easy to get to the train station."
Service

9.0 "World class service."

9.4 "94% found the staff to be very friendly."

9.3 "93% thought the service was very professional."

7.5 "75% said the reception staff was great."

7.8 "Housekeeping was great, according to 78%."

10.0 "Management was excellent, said 100%."
Amenities

5.2 "Average amenities."

5.8 "58% found the grounds not bad."
Breakfast

5.1 "Breakfast is mediocre."
Room

4.4 "Rooms are not good."

3.5 "65% complained about the bathroom."

0.9 "91% thought they were poorly maintained."

0.8 "For 92%, the rooms looked old."

2.0 "80% had problems with the shower."

1.9 "Air conditioning was criticized by 81%."

2.2 "78% found problems with the furniture."

1.1 "89% thought the tv was sub-standard."
Comfort

4.1 "Not very comfortable."

1.9 "81% thought it was too noisy."

1.9 "Air conditioning was criticized by 81%."
Vibe

3.3 "Vibe wasn't good."

0.6 "94% criticized the unstylish hotel."
WiFi

3.0 "Disappointing internet connection."

3.0 "70% said the wifi quality was bad."

View all review categories

Based on 604 reviews

Location

9.0 "Terrific location."

10.0 "100% liked the proximity to sightseeing."

8.0 "Near to public transport, according to 80%."
Service

8.9 "Great service."

9.3 "93% found the staff to be very friendly."

7.4 "74% said the reception staff was great."

9.2 "92% thought the service was very professional."

7.7 "Housekeeping was great, according to 77%."
Breakfast

5.2 "Breakfast is mediocre."
Room

4.2 "Rooms are not good."

3.6 "64% complained about the bathroom."

0.8 "92% thought they were poorly maintained."

2.1 "79% had problems with the shower."

1.0 "For 90%, the rooms looked old."

1.3 "87% thought the tv was sub-standard."

1.8 "Air conditioning was criticized by 82%."
Comfort

4.0 "Not very comfortable."

2.2 "78% thought it was too noisy."

1.8 "Air conditioning was criticized by 82%."
Vibe

3.2 "Horrible vibe."

0.7 "93% criticized the unstylish hotel."
WiFi

3.0 "Disappointing internet connection."

2.9 "71% said the wifi quality was bad."

View all review categories

Based on 54 reviews

Location

9.2 "Terrific location."
Service

8.9 "Great service."

9.3 "93% found the staff to be very friendly."
Room

4.2 "Rooms are not good."
Comfort

3.8 "Not very comfortable."

Based on 21 reviews

Location

9.2 "Terrific location."
Service

8.8 "Great service."

9.2 "92% found the staff to be very friendly."
Room

4.1 "Rooms are not good."
Vibe

3.5 "Vibe wasn't good."

Based on 417 reviews

Location

9.0 "Terrific location."

10.0 "100% liked the proximity to sightseeing."

10.0 "100% liked the proximity to shopping."
Service

8.9 "Great service."

9.4 "94% found the staff to be very friendly."

7.7 "77% said the reception staff was great."

8.0 "Housekeeping was great, according to 80%."

9.4 "94% thought the service was very professional."
Amenities

5.2 "Average amenities."

5.0 "50% thought the building was acceptable."
Breakfast

5.1 "Breakfast is mediocre."
Room

4.2 "Rooms are not good."

3.4 "66% complained about the bathroom."

0.8 "92% thought they were poorly maintained."

2.0 "80% found problems with the furniture."

0.7 "For 93%, the rooms looked old."

1.6 "Air conditioning was criticized by 84%."
Comfort

4.1 "Not very comfortable."

2.1 "79% thought it was too noisy."

1.6 "Air conditioning was criticized by 84%."
Vibe

3.2 "Horrible vibe."

0.5 "95% criticized the unstylish hotel."
WiFi

3.0 "Disappointing internet connection."

2.9 "71% said the wifi quality was bad."