Overview

Jinjiang Inn - Suzhou Liu Garden

No.2 Liuyuan Rd., Suzhou 215008, China
+86 512 6533 1266

$23+

Overall guest ratings

8.4/10 Excellent
Based on 1,546 reviews

Review highlights

  • 9.4
  • 8.2
  • 4.8
  • 4.6

Good to know

  • Good accessibility by car
  • Wonderful sightseeing
  • Close to public transport

Nearby

    Show all

    About

    Located in Suzhou City Centre, this hotel is within a 10-minute walk of Shantang Street and Cloud Capped Peak. JiangNan ChuanWenHua BoLanGuan and Shantang Diaohualou are also within 15 minutes.

    Less More
    Expedia

    Amenities

    • Free Wi-Fi
    • Business center
    • Laundry service
    • Restaurant
    • Air-conditioned
    • 24 Hour Front Desk
    • Safe
    • Free parking
    • Storage available
    • Non-smoking rooms available
    • Laundry facilities
    • Meeting/Banquet facilities
    • Free Internet
    Less More
    Reviews

    Guest reviews

    Overall Rating

    8.4 Excellent
    Based on 1,546 reviews
    • 9.4 "Terrific location."
      9.7 "Easily accessible by car, said 97%."
      9.8 "98% liked the proximity to sightseeing."
      10.0 "Near to public transport, according to 100%."
      9.9 "99% liked the proximity to shopping."
      9.0 "90% thought it was easy to get to the train station."
      10.0 "100% enjoyed the restaurants & bars nearby."
    • 8.2 "Great service."
      8.3 "83% found the staff to be very friendly."
      8.0 "80% thought the service was very professional."
      7.3 "73% said the reception staff was great."
      10.0 "100% were happy with the shuttle service."
    • 7.4 "Good breakfast."
    • 4.8 "Rooms are not good."
      1.9 "81% complained about the bathroom."
      3.2 "68% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      0.0 "For 100%, the rooms looked old."
      1.9 "Air conditioning was criticized by 81%."
      1.7 "83% criticized the small bathroom."
      0.4 "96% thought the tv was sub-standard."
      0.0 "100% thought they were poorly maintained."
      2.5 "75% said the bathroom was dirty."
      0.0 "100% had problems with the shower."
    • 4.6 "Vibe wasn't good."
      0.3 "97% criticized the unstylish hotel."
    • 4.0 "Internet is poor."
      3.8 "62% said the wifi quality was bad."
    • 3.9 "Not very comfortable."
      3.2 "68% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      3.2 "68% thought it was too noisy."
      1.9 "Air conditioning was criticized by 81%."
      1.7 "83% criticized the small bathroom."
    • 3.2 "Terrible amenities."
      3.0 "70% thought the building wasn't nice."
      0.3 "97% thought the facilities needed updating."
      1.5 "85% complained about the elevator."
    View all review categories

    Overall Rating

    8.5 Excellent
    Based on 371 reviews
    • 9.6 "Terrific location."
      9.8 "Easily accessible by car, said 98%."
      9.8 "98% liked the proximity to sightseeing."
      10.0 "Near to public transport, according to 100%."
    • 8.1 "Great service."
    • 7.9 "Good cleanliness."
      7.6 "76% said rooms were clean."
    • 5.0 "Rooms are ok."
    • 4.2 "Vibe wasn't good."
      0.2 "98% criticized the unstylish hotel."
    • 4.0 "Not very comfortable."
      3.1 "69% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
    • 2.9 "Terrible amenities."
      2.8 "72% thought the building wasn't nice."
      0.3 "97% thought the facilities needed updating."
    View all review categories

    Overall Rating

    8.3 Excellent
    Based on 757 reviews
    • 9.7 "Terrific location."
      9.7 "Easily accessible by car, said 97%."
      9.8 "98% liked the proximity to sightseeing."
      10.0 "Near to public transport, according to 100%."
      9.9 "99% liked the proximity to shopping."
    • 7.9 "Good service."
    • 7.8 "Good breakfast."
    • 4.2 "Vibe wasn't good."
      0.2 "98% criticized the unstylish hotel."
    • 4.2 "Rooms are not good."
      3.0 "70% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      0.0 "For 100%, the rooms looked old."
      1.8 "82% complained about the bathroom."
      2.0 "Air conditioning was criticized by 80%."
    • 3.6 "Not very comfortable."
      3.0 "70% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      2.9 "71% thought it was too noisy."
      2.0 "Air conditioning was criticized by 80%."
    • 3.2 "Terrible amenities."
      3.0 "70% thought the building wasn't nice."
      0.3 "97% thought the facilities needed updating."
    View all review categories

    Overall Rating

    8.6 Excellent
    Based on 324 reviews
    • 9.5 "Terrific location."
      9.8 "Easily accessible by car, said 98%."
      9.8 "98% liked the proximity to sightseeing."
      10.0 "Near to public transport, according to 100%."
    • 8.1 "Great service."
    • 4.6 "Vibe wasn't good."
      0.3 "97% criticized the unstylish hotel."
    • 4.5 "Rooms are not good."
      2.3 "77% complained about the bathroom."
      5.0 "Only 50% said rooms were big enough."
    • 3.8 "Not very comfortable."
      5.0 "Only 50% said rooms were big enough."
      3.3 "67% thought it was too noisy."
    • 2.9 "Terrible amenities."
      2.7 "73% thought the building wasn't nice."
      0.3 "97% thought the facilities needed updating."

    Overall Rating

    8.1 Excellent
    Based on 92 reviews
    • 9.6 "Terrific location."
      9.8 "Easily accessible by car, said 98%."
    • 8.3 "Great service."
    • 8.2 "Good value."
    • 4.3 "Rooms are not good."
    • 3.8 "Not very comfortable."
    • 3.3 "Bad amenities."
      3.0 "70% thought the building wasn't nice."
    Hotel type
    Friends Hotel
    Guests recommend this for traveling with friends.
    Good to know
    "Good accessibility by car"
    "Wonderful sightseeing"
    "Close to public transport"
    data provided by TrustYou
    Photos
    Map

    Map