Overview

Thomas James Hotel

45 - 47 Bath Street, Royal Leamington Spa, CV31 3AG, United Kingdom
+44 192 631 2568

$58+

Rates
Check in
Check out

Overall guest ratings

5.8/10 Okay
Based on 628 reviews
See all reviews

Review highlights

  • 8.2
  • 5.8
  • 3.9
  • 3.6

Nearby

    Show all

    About

    The Thomas James Hotel has a Regency style of architecture and is a Grade II listed building located in a conservation area of Royal Leamington Spa. The hotel is situated at the bottom of the main shopping high street in Leamington Spa. It is a two minute walk from Leamington Train station and the town centre is a short walk away. There are a wide variety of bars and restaurants within walking distance.

    Less More booking.com

    Amenities

    • No smoking
    • Restaurant
    • Bar/Lounge
    • Designated smoking area
    • Storage available
    • Free Wi-Fi
    Less More
    Map

    Map

    Photos
    Reviews

    Guest reviews

    Overall Rating

    5.8 Okay
    Based on 628 reviews
    • 8.2 "Location is great."
    • 5.8 "Service is ok."
    • 5.7 "Breakfast is mediocre."
    • 5.2 "Bar is ok."
    • 5.2 "Internet is average."
    • 3.9 "Vibe wasn't good."
    • 3.6 "Not very comfortable."
    • 3.4 "Not very clean."
    • 2.5 "Awful rooms."
    • 2.4 "Terrible amenities."
    View all review categories

    Overall Rating

    5.6 Okay
    Based on 270 reviews
    • 8.3 "Location is great."
      10.0 "City centre within easy reach, said 100%."
      10.0 "100% thought it was easy to get to the train station."
    • 5.6 "Breakfast is mediocre."
    • 5.6 "Service is ok."
    • 5.0 "Bar is ok."
    • 4.2 "Vibe wasn't good."
      2.7 "Unfriendly atmosphere, according to 73%."
    • 4.0 "Not very comfortable."
      3.9 "61% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      2.7 "73% said rooms were small."
      4.0 "60% thought it was too noisy."
    • 3.5 "Not very clean."
      3.6 "64% said rooms were dirty."
      2.2 "78% said the bathroom was dirty."
      3.0 "70% thought it was rather dirty."
    • 3.0 "Awful rooms."
      2.5 "75% complained about the bathroom."
      0.2 "98% thought they were poorly maintained."
      3.9 "61% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      3.0 "70% had problems with the shower."
      3.6 "64% said rooms were dirty."
      2.7 "73% said rooms were small."
      2.2 "78% said the bathroom was dirty."
      2.8 "72% found problems with the furniture."
    • 2.3 "Terrible amenities."
      2.6 "74% thought the building wasn't nice."
    View all review categories

    Overall Rating

    5.0 Okay
    Based on 31 reviews
    • 7.6 "Good location."
    • 5.6 "Service is ok."
    • 3.9 "Not very comfortable."
    • 3.1 "Generally quite dirty."
      3.2 "68% said rooms were dirty."
    • 2.8 "Awful rooms."
      2.7 "73% complained about the bathroom."
      0.1 "99% thought they were poorly maintained."
      2.6 "74% had problems with the shower."
      3.2 "68% said rooms were dirty."

    Overall Rating

    6.0 Okay
    Based on 326 reviews
    • 8.3 "Location is great."
      10.0 "100% thought it was easy to get to the train station."
      10.0 "City centre within easy reach, said 100%."
    • 6.1 "Breakfast is mediocre."
    • 5.9 "Service is ok."
    • 5.4 "Bar is ok."
    • 4.8 "Internet is poor."
    • 3.9 "Vibe wasn't good."
      3.1 "For 69%, the lobby entrance was sub-standard."
      2.5 "Unfriendly atmosphere, according to 75%."
    • 3.5 "Not very clean."
      3.5 "65% said rooms were dirty."
      2.4 "76% said the bathroom was dirty."
      3.3 "67% thought it was rather dirty."
    • 3.2 "Quite uncomfortable."
      3.3 "67% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      3.9 "61% thought it was too noisy."
      2.7 "73% said rooms were small."
    • 2.6 "Terrible amenities."
      2.7 "73% thought the building wasn't nice."
      3.1 "For 69%, the lobby entrance was sub-standard."
    View all review categories
    data provided by TrustYou

    Recent Reviews

    More

    Close
    Would you like to save as your currency permanently or for this visit only?