Guest reviews
-
All Reviews
-
Couples
-
Families
-
Business
-
Solo
Overall Rating
-
9.6 "Terrific location."9.9 "99% thought it was
easy to get to the train station ." 9.6 "96%liked the proximity to shopping ." 9.8 "Easily accessible by car , said 98%." 9.9 "Near to public transport , according to 99%." 10.0 "100%liked the proximity to sightseeing ." 10.0 "100%enjoyed the restaurants & bars nearby ." 10.0 "Good access to the airport , said 100%." 10.0 "City centre within easy reach , said 100%." -
7.9 "Good service."8.8 "88% thought the
service was very professional ." 7.3 "Housekeeping was great , according to 73%." 8.3 "Hotel security was great , thought 83%." 7.1 "71% said theconcierge service was amazing ." -
7.1 "Good breakfast."
-
5.3 "Rooms are ok."5.6 "For only 56%, the
bathroom was ok ." 6.6 "Only 66% saidrooms were clean enough ." 5.5 "Beds were acceptable for 55%." 5.3 "53% thought thebathroom was big enough ." 5.1 "Only 51% thought thefurniture was functional ." 5.9 "Only 59% thought theshower was ok ." 5.2 "For only 52%, thetv was ok ." 6.4 "64% thought thekitchenette was ok ." -
5.1 "Average value."6.7 "The
price was ok for 67%." -
3.6 "Not very comfortable."2.8 "72% said
rooms were small ." 4.3 "57% thought it wastoo noisy ." -
2.6 "Disappointing internet connection."2.2 "78% said the
wifi quality was bad ."
Overall Rating
-
9.5 "Terrific location."9.8 "
Easily accessible by car , said 98%." 9.6 "96%liked the proximity to shopping ." 10.0 "100% thought it waseasy to get to the train station ." 9.9 "Near to public transport , according to 99%." 10.0 "100%liked the proximity to sightseeing ." 10.0 "Good access to the airport , said 100%." -
8.9 "Great service."9.0 "90% thought the
service was very professional ." 7.8 "Housekeeping was great , according to 78%." -
6.7 "Breakfast is mediocre."
-
5.2 "Average value."
-
4.6 "Rooms are not good."2.1 "79% said
rooms were small ." 2.9 "For 71%, therooms looked old ." 4.1 "59% thought they werepoorly maintained ." -
2.7 "Quite uncomfortable."2.1 "79% said
rooms were small ." 4.6 "54% thought it wastoo noisy ." -
2.5 "Disappointing internet connection."2.1 "79% said the
wifi quality was bad ."
Overall Rating
-
9.6 "Terrific location."9.9 "
Easily accessible by car , said 99%." 9.9 "99% thought it waseasy to get to the train station ." 9.6 "96%liked the proximity to shopping ." 9.9 "Near to public transport , according to 99%." 10.0 "100%liked the proximity to sightseeing ." 10.0 "100%enjoyed the restaurants & bars nearby ." -
8.3 "Great service."9.1 "91% found the
staff to be very friendly ." 8.7 "87% thought theservice was very professional ." 7.4 "Housekeeping was great , according to 74%." -
7.5 "Good breakfast."
-
4.8 "Value below average."
-
4.8 "Rooms are not good."2.0 "80% said
rooms were small ." 2.9 "For 71%, therooms looked old ." -
3.0 "Quite uncomfortable."2.0 "80% said
rooms were small ." 4.5 "55% thought it wastoo noisy ." -
2.6 "Disappointing internet connection."2.1 "79% said the
wifi quality was bad ."
Overall Rating
-
9.5 "Terrific location."9.9 "
Easily accessible by car , said 99%." 9.9 "99% thought it waseasy to get to the train station ." 9.5 "95%liked the proximity to shopping ." 9.9 "Near to public transport , according to 99%." -
8.3 "Great service."8.8 "88% thought the
service was very professional ." 7.7 "Housekeeping was great , according to 77%." -
7.3 "Good breakfast."
-
6.8 "Average cleanliness."6.6 "Only 66% said
rooms were clean enough ." -
5.9 "Average value."
-
5.8 "Rooms are ok."6.6 "Only 66% said
rooms were clean enough ." 5.7 "For only 57%, thebathroom was ok ." 5.7 "Beds were acceptable for 57%." 5.3 "53% thought thebathroom was big enough ." -
2.6 "Disappointing internet connection."2.3 "77% said the
wifi quality was bad ."
Overall Rating
-
9.5 "Terrific location."9.4 "94%
liked the proximity to shopping ." 9.9 "99% thought it waseasy to get to the train station ." 9.9 "Easily accessible by car , said 99%." 9.9 "Near to public transport , according to 99%." -
8.3 "Great service."9.2 "92% found the
staff to be very friendly ." 8.7 "87% thought theservice was very professional ." 7.3 "Housekeeping was great , according to 73%." -
7.1 "Good breakfast."
-
5.8 "Rooms are ok."5.8 "For only 58%, the
bathroom was ok ." 5.9 "Beds were acceptable for 59%." 5.6 "56% thought thebathroom was big enough ." 5.9 "Only 59% thought theshower was ok ." -
4.5 "Value below average."
-
2.7 "Disappointing internet connection."2.4 "76% said the
wifi quality was bad ."
Recent reviews
- All reviews
- Positive
- Neutral
- Negative
-
10.0review from
Location, staff, cleanliness None
-
9.4review from
Nice rooms, strategically located, very convenient and close to everything. None
-
9.1review from
Room was nice/clean, great view, connected to main train station. Staff were very helpful (accidentally booked in a smoking room, they found me an alternate, non-smoking room despite being very full).
-
6.0review from
The location. Close to the train station Had to take smoking section
-
8.0review from
Located above railway station. Also high enough to keep above city noise so a good sleep.
-
5.0review from
the comfort of the bed
-
7.0review from
Hotel staff are well trained and they communciate with each other well. They are efficient and at the same time hospitable. Great location for those travellers, using railway or bus connections to other cities. No individual safe deposit box in room. No business centre facility.
-
6.7review from
The hotel is in the Osaka railway station which is very comfortable. The shopping center is located around the station. Perfect for a short stay where you have direct access shopping, transportation, restaurants and amusement. The rooms are more spacious than an average business hotel in Japan. I had a nice view from my hotel room. Most rooms are located on 20+ floors. You could hear some street noise from the amusement area, but it was still okay for me.
-
6.0review from
The location is really convenient, and there is free internet facility at the hotel room. The room is super small, smallest hotel room I have ever been, lucky it was quiet modern and clean, although I would have preferred Hilton if I knew it was just across the road. Also while there was free Internet, the PC was super slow (My room was AMD 1 Ghz with 512MB memory)..
-
8.0review from
Location at Osaka JR station very convenient
-
10.0review from
Location, staff, cleanliness None
-
9.4review from
Nice rooms, strategically located, very convenient and close to everything. None
-
9.1review from
Room was nice/clean, great view, connected to main train station. Staff were very helpful (accidentally booked in a smoking room, they found me an alternate, non-smoking room despite being very full).
-
8.0review from
Located above railway station. Also high enough to keep above city noise so a good sleep.
-
8.0review from
Location at Osaka JR station very convenient
-
7.0review from
Hotel staff are well trained and they communciate with each other well. They are efficient and at the same time hospitable. Great location for those travellers, using railway or bus connections to other cities. No individual safe deposit box in room. No business centre facility.
-
6.7review from
The hotel is in the Osaka railway station which is very comfortable. The shopping center is located around the station. Perfect for a short stay where you have direct access shopping, transportation, restaurants and amusement. The rooms are more spacious than an average business hotel in Japan. I had a nice view from my hotel room. Most rooms are located on 20+ floors. You could hear some street noise from the amusement area, but it was still okay for me.
-
6.0review from
The location. Close to the train station Had to take smoking section
-
5.0review from
the comfort of the bed
-
6.0review from
The location is really convenient, and there is free internet facility at the hotel room. The room is super small, smallest hotel room I have ever been, lucky it was quiet modern and clean, although I would have preferred Hilton if I knew it was just across the road. Also while there was free Internet, the PC was super slow (My room was AMD 1 Ghz with 512MB memory)..
