Overview

Beijing Maple Hotel (Jiuxianqiao)

5 Jiangtai Road (Jiangtai Lu), Beijing 100016, China
+86 106 432 2288

$32+

Overall guest ratings

6.8/10 Good
Based on 2,391 reviews

Review highlights

  • 9.4
  • 9.1
  • 4.3
  • 3.7

Nearby

    Show all
    Reviews

    Guest reviews of Beijing Maple Hotel (Jiuxianqiao)

    Overall Rating

    6.8 Good
    Based on 2,391 reviews
    • 9.4 "Terrific location."
      9.6 "Easily accessible by car, said 96%."
      9.8 "Near to public transport, according to 98%."
      9.8 "98% liked the proximity to shopping."
      10.0 "100% liked the proximity to sightseeing."
      10.0 "Business sites within easy reach, said 100%."
      10.0 "100% enjoyed the restaurants & bars nearby."
    • 9.1 "Excellent value."
    • 7.7 "Good service."
      8.5 "85% thought the service was very professional."
      8.5 "85% found the staff to be very friendly."
    • 6.8 "Breakfast is mediocre."
    • 4.3 "Not very clean."
      4.5 "55% said rooms were dirty."
      0.8 "92% said the bathroom was dirty."
      3.7 "63% thought it was rather dirty."
      0.0 "Unclean dining area, according to 100%."
    • 3.7 "Vibe wasn't good."
      0.1 "99% criticized the unstylish hotel."
    • 3.4 "Rooms are not good."
      2.3 "77% complained about the bathroom."
      4.5 "55% said rooms were dirty."
      3.8 "62% said rooms were small."
      0.2 "For 98%, the rooms looked old."
      1.4 "Air conditioning was criticized by 86%."
      3.9 "61% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      0.0 "100% thought they were poorly maintained."
      0.6 "94% thought the tv was sub-standard."
      0.8 "92% said the bathroom was dirty."
      3.5 "65% criticized the small bathroom."
      1.2 "88% had problems with the shower."
      2.5 "75% found problems with the furniture."
      1.4 "86% were unsatisfied with the kitchenette."
    • 2.1 "Terrible amenities."
      2.1 "79% thought the building wasn't nice."
      0.0 "100% thought the facilities needed updating."
      4.3 "57% complained about the elevator."
    • 1.5 "Disappointing internet connection."
      1.4 "86% said the wifi quality was bad."
    View all review categories

    Overall Rating

    6.7 Good
    Based on 215 reviews
    • 9.0 "Terrific location."
    • 8.9 "Good value."
    • 7.8 "Good service."
    • 4.1 "Vibe wasn't good."
      0.1 "99% criticized the unstylish hotel."
    • 4.0 "Not very clean."
      4.2 "58% said rooms were dirty."
      0.7 "93% said the bathroom was dirty."
    • 3.3 "Not very comfortable."
      3.9 "61% said rooms were small."
      3.9 "61% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
    • 3.2 "Awful rooms."
      2.1 "79% complained about the bathroom."
      4.2 "58% said rooms were dirty."
      0.7 "93% said the bathroom was dirty."
      3.9 "61% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      3.9 "61% said rooms were small."
    • 2.6 "Terrible amenities."
      2.6 "74% thought the building wasn't nice."
    View all review categories

    Overall Rating

    6.6 Good
    Based on 71 reviews
    • 9.3 "Terrific location."
    • 7.5 "Good service."
    • 3.7 "Rooms are not good."
    • 3.5 "Vibe wasn't good."
      0.1 "99% criticized the unstylish hotel."

    Overall Rating

    7.1 Good
    Based on 1,601 reviews
    • 9.8 "Terrific location."
      9.8 "Easily accessible by car, said 98%."
      9.8 "Near to public transport, according to 98%."
      9.8 "98% liked the proximity to shopping."
      10.0 "Business sites within easy reach, said 100%."
    • 9.2 "Excellent value."
    • 8.1 "Great service."
      8.5 "85% thought the service was very professional."
      8.7 "87% found the staff to be very friendly."
    • 7.1 "Good breakfast."
    • 4.6 "Not very clean."
      4.8 "52% said rooms were dirty."
    • 3.4 "Vibe wasn't good."
      0.1 "99% criticized the unstylish hotel."
    • 3.3 "Rooms are not good."
      4.8 "52% said rooms were dirty."
      3.3 "67% said rooms were small."
      0.2 "For 98%, the rooms looked old."
      2.0 "80% complained about the bathroom."
      1.3 "Air conditioning was criticized by 87%."
      0.6 "94% thought the tv was sub-standard."
      0.0 "100% thought they were poorly maintained."
      4.2 "58% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
    • 3.1 "Quite uncomfortable."
      3.3 "67% said rooms were small."
      1.3 "Air conditioning was criticized by 87%."
      4.2 "58% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      5.0 "For only 50%, the noise level was all right."
    • 2.5 "Terrible amenities."
      2.5 "75% thought the building wasn't nice."
      0.0 "100% thought the facilities needed updating."
    View all review categories

    Overall Rating

    6.3 Good
    Based on 502 reviews
    • 9.3 "Terrific location."
      9.8 "Near to public transport, according to 98%."
    • 8.9 "Good value."
    • 7.2 "Good breakfast."
    • 7.1 "Good service."
    • 3.7 "Not very clean."
      4.0 "60% said rooms were dirty."
    • 3.1 "Awful rooms."
      1.9 "81% complained about the bathroom."
      4.0 "60% said rooms were dirty."
      3.9 "61% said rooms were small."
    • 2.8 "Horrible vibe."
      0.1 "99% criticized the unstylish hotel."
    • 1.7 "Terrible amenities."
      1.6 "84% thought the building wasn't nice."
      0.0 "100% thought the facilities needed updating."
    • 1.6 "Disappointing internet connection."
      1.5 "85% said the wifi quality was bad."
    View all review categories
    Hotel type
    Solo Hotel
    Guests recommend this hotel for solo travelers.
    City Hotel
    Guests say it is the perfect hotel for a city trip.
    Economy Hotel
    Guests recommend this hotel for budget travelers.
    data provided by TrustYou

    Recent reviews

    Find reviews that mention:

    Map

    Map