Overview
Back to all Cáceres hotels

Hostal Neptuno

Avda. de Alemania n 19(bajo), 10005 Cáceres, Extremadura, Spain
+34 927 236 423

$28+

Hostal Neptuno

Overall guest ratings

6.9/10 Good
Based on 900 reviews

Review highlights

  • 9.2
  • 8.6
  • 4.8
  • 4.7

Good to know

  • Near city centre

Nearby

    Show all

    Amenities

    • Internet
    • Restaurant
    • Bar/Lounge
    • Parking
    • Air-conditioned
    • 24 Hour Front Desk
    • Free Wi-Fi
    • Non-smoking rooms available
    • Pets allowed on request. Charges may apply.
    • Terrace/Patio
    • Facilities for Disabled Guests
    Less More
    Reviews

    Guest reviews

    • All Reviews
    • Couples
    • Families
    • Business
    • Solo

    Overall Rating

    6.9 Good
    Based on 900 reviews
    • 9.2 "Excellent value."
    • 8.6 "Great service."
      9.7 "97% found the staff to be very friendly."
      7.6 "76% thought the service was very professional."
      10.0 "Management was excellent, said 100%."
    • 8.5 "Location is great."
      7.9 "City centre within easy reach, said 79%."
      8.1 "Great parking, according to 81%."
      8.9 "89% thought parking was inexpensive."
      8.6 "Near to public transport, according to 86%."
      8.0 "Easily accessible by car, said 80%."
    • 7.4 "Good breakfast."
    • 4.8 "Not very clean."
      4.1 "59% said rooms were dirty."
      2.9 "71% said the bathroom was dirty."
    • 4.7 "Not very comfortable."
      5.0 "Beds were acceptable for 50%."
      2.0 "80% thought it was too noisy."
      2.4 "Air conditioning was criticized by 76%."
    • 4.0 "Internet is poor."
      2.6 "74% said the wifi quality was bad."
    • 3.6 "Rooms are not good."
      3.0 "70% complained about the bathroom."
      5.0 "Beds were acceptable for 50%."
      0.9 "91% thought they were poorly maintained."
      3.3 "67% found problems with the furniture."
      0.2 "For 98%, the rooms looked old."
      2.8 "72% had problems with the shower."
      4.1 "59% said rooms were dirty."
      2.5 "75% thought the tv was sub-standard."
      2.4 "Air conditioning was criticized by 76%."
      2.9 "71% said the bathroom was dirty."
    • 3.6 "Bad amenities."
      3.6 "64% thought the building wasn't nice."
      4.0 "Fair terrace, said 60%."
      3.1 "69% didn't like the architecture."
    View all review categories

    Overall Rating

    6.9 Good
    Based on 540 reviews
    • 8.7 "Location is great."
      8.1 "City centre within easy reach, said 81%."
      8.2 "Great parking, according to 82%."
    • 8.6 "Great service."
      9.8 "98% found the staff to be very friendly."
    • 7.5 "Good breakfast."
    • 5.0 "Average cleanliness."
      4.3 "57% said rooms were dirty."
    • 4.7 "Not very comfortable."
      2.2 "78% thought it was too noisy."
      2.3 "Air conditioning was criticized by 77%."
    • 4.3 "Internet is poor."
    • 3.6 "Bad amenities."
      3.6 "64% thought the building wasn't nice."
    • 3.5 "Rooms are not good."
      3.1 "69% complained about the bathroom."
      0.1 "For 99%, the rooms looked old."
      0.9 "91% thought they were poorly maintained."
      3.1 "69% found problems with the furniture."
      3.0 "70% had problems with the shower."
      2.3 "Air conditioning was criticized by 77%."
      4.3 "57% said rooms were dirty."
    View all review categories

    Overall Rating

    6.9 Good
    Based on 243 reviews
    • 9.3 "Excellent value."
    • 8.5 "Great service."
      9.8 "98% found the staff to be very friendly."
      7.7 "77% thought the service was very professional."
    • 8.4 "Location is great."
      8.0 "Great parking, according to 80%."
      7.8 "City centre within easy reach, said 78%."
    • 4.7 "Not very clean."
      4.0 "60% said rooms were dirty."
    • 4.4 "Not very comfortable."
      4.8 "52% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      2.3 "77% thought it was too noisy."
      2.0 "Air conditioning was criticized by 80%."
    • 3.4 "Bad amenities."
      3.4 "66% thought the building wasn't nice."
    • 3.3 "Rooms are not good."
      2.8 "72% complained about the bathroom."
      0.7 "93% thought they were poorly maintained."
      4.8 "52% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      0.3 "For 97%, the rooms looked old."
      3.4 "66% found problems with the furniture."
      4.0 "60% said rooms were dirty."
      2.0 "Air conditioning was criticized by 80%."
      2.6 "74% had problems with the shower."
    • 1.7 "Horrible vibe."
      0.3 "97% criticized the unstylish hotel."
    View all review categories

    Overall Rating

    7.1 Good
    Based on 117 reviews
    • 9.1 "Excellent value."
    • 8.5 "Great service."
      9.4 "94% found the staff to be very friendly."
    • 8.2 "Location is great."
    • 4.9 "Not very comfortable."
    • 4.3 "Internet is poor."
    • 4.3 "Not very clean."
    • 3.8 "Rooms are not good."
      3.2 "68% complained about the bathroom."
      0.8 "92% thought they were poorly maintained."
      3.1 "69% found problems with the furniture."
    View all review categories
    Hotel type
    Solo Hotel
    Guests recommend this hotel for solo travelers.
    Friends Hotel
    Guests recommend this for traveling with friends.
    City Hotel
    Guests say it is the perfect hotel for a city trip.
    Good to know
    "Near city centre"
    data provided by TrustYou
    Map

    Map