Overview

Hotel Strand Continental - Hostel

143 The Strand, London, WC2R 1JA, United Kingdom
+44 207 836 4880

$27+

Overall guest ratings

6.6/10 Good
Based on 1,456 reviews

Review highlights

  • 9.3
  • 4.8
  • 3.8
  • 3.5

Nearby

    Show all

    About

    You'll be in a fantastic location at Hotel Strand Continental - Hostel, just a 5-minute walk from King's College London and Covent Garden. Guests looking for a bite to eat can check out The India Club Restaurant, which serves Indian cuisine and is open for lunch and dinner. Also, Royal Opera House and London Coliseum are within just a 10-minute walk.

    Less More
    Hotels.com

    Amenities

    • Complimentary breakfast
    • Free Wi-Fi
    • Internet
    • Meeting/Banquet facilities
    • No smoking
    • Restaurant
    • Bar/Lounge
    • 24 Hour Front Desk
    • Safe
    • Storage available
    • Room service
    • Concierge service
    • Pets not allowed
    Less More
    Reviews

    Guest reviews

    Overall Rating

    6.6 Good
    Based on 1,456 reviews
    • 9.3 "Terrific location."
      10.0 "100% liked the proximity to sightseeing."
      9.1 "Near to public transport, according to 91%."
      9.2 "City centre within easy reach, said 92%."
      10.0 "100% enjoyed the restaurants & bars nearby."
    • 7.6 "Good service."
      9.0 "90% found the staff to be very friendly."
      8.0 "80% said the reception staff was great."
      7.4 "74% thought the service was very professional."
    • 4.8 "Breakfast is below average."
    • 3.8 "Internet is poor."
      3.5 "65% said the wifi quality was bad."
    • 3.5 "Rooms are not good."
      3.0 "70% complained about the bathroom."
      4.8 "52% said rooms were dirty."
      4.9 "51% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      1.2 "88% thought they were poorly maintained."
      1.6 "84% had problems with the shower."
      1.1 "89% said rooms were small."
      2.8 "72% found problems with the furniture."
      2.2 "For 78%, the rooms looked old."
      0.0 "100% criticized the small bathroom."
      4.2 "58% thought the tv was sub-standard."
      3.8 "Air conditioning was criticized by 62%."
    • 3.4 "Bad amenities."
      3.4 "66% thought the building wasn't nice."
      4.2 "58% complained about the elevator."
      0.2 "98% thought the facilities needed updating."
      3.0 "70% didn't like the architecture."

    Overall Rating

    6.3 Good
    Based on 291 reviews
    • 9.1 "Terrific location."
    • 7.6 "Good service."
      8.9 "89% found the staff to be very friendly."
    • 4.6 "Breakfast is below average."
    • 4.0 "Not very clean."
      4.3 "57% said rooms were dirty."
      4.7 "53% said the bathroom was dirty."
      3.7 "63% thought it was rather dirty."
    • 3.5 "Internet is poor."
      3.3 "67% said the wifi quality was bad."
    • 3.3 "Rooms are not good."
      2.7 "73% complained about the bathroom."
      4.3 "57% said rooms were dirty."
      4.7 "53% said the bathroom was dirty."
      1.6 "84% had problems with the shower."
      1.1 "89% said rooms were small."
      1.0 "90% thought they were poorly maintained."
      2.6 "74% found problems with the furniture."
      1.9 "For 81%, the rooms looked old."
    • 3.3 "Bad amenities."
      3.3 "67% thought the building wasn't nice."
      4.3 "57% complained about the elevator."
    View all review categories

    Overall Rating

    6.4 Good
    Based on 334 reviews
    • 9.2 "Terrific location."
      10.0 "100% liked the proximity to sightseeing."
    • 7.5 "Good service."
      9.0 "90% found the staff to be very friendly."
      7.2 "72% thought the service was very professional."
    • 4.6 "Breakfast is below average."
    • 3.8 "Internet is poor."
      3.5 "65% said the wifi quality was bad."
    • 3.5 "Not very comfortable."
      4.7 "53% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      2.4 "76% thought it was too noisy."
      0.9 "91% said rooms were small."
    • 3.4 "Rooms are not good."
      4.7 "53% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."
      2.8 "72% complained about the bathroom."
      4.9 "51% said rooms were dirty."
      1.8 "For 82%, the rooms looked old."
      0.9 "91% said rooms were small."
      1.4 "86% had problems with the shower."
      1.0 "90% thought they were poorly maintained."
      2.4 "76% found problems with the furniture."
    • 3.4 "Bad amenities."
      3.4 "66% thought the building wasn't nice."
      4.0 "60% complained about the elevator."
    View all review categories

    Overall Rating

    5.8 Okay
    Based on 14 reviews
    • 3.4 "Rooms are not good."

    Overall Rating

    6.8 Good
    Based on 815 reviews
    • 9.3 "Terrific location."
      10.0 "100% liked the proximity to sightseeing."
      9.4 "City centre within easy reach, said 94%."
      9.0 "Near to public transport, according to 90%."
    • 7.7 "Good service."
      8.9 "89% found the staff to be very friendly."
      7.6 "76% said the reception staff was great."
    • 4.6 "Breakfast is below average."
    • 3.8 "Internet is poor."
      3.5 "65% said the wifi quality was bad."
    • 3.6 "Rooms are not good."
      2.9 "71% complained about the bathroom."
      4.9 "51% said rooms were dirty."
      1.0 "90% thought they were poorly maintained."
      1.0 "90% said rooms were small."
      1.6 "84% had problems with the shower."
      4.3 "57% thought the tv was sub-standard."
      0.0 "100% criticized the small bathroom."
      2.1 "For 79%, the rooms looked old."
    • 3.1 "Terrible amenities."
      3.2 "68% thought the building wasn't nice."
      4.2 "58% complained about the elevator."
      0.3 "97% thought the facilities needed updating."
    data provided by TrustYou

    Recent reviews

    Find reviews that mention:
    More
    More
    Photos
    Map

    Map