Overview

King Royal Garden Inn

245 South Sathorn Road, Yannawa, Sathorn, Bangkok, Thailand
+66 2 675 8120

$25+

Overall guest ratings

6.9/10 Good
Based on 1,596 reviews

Review highlights

  • 9.1
  • 6.7
  • 4.2
  • 3.2

Good to know

  • Spacious rooms

Nearby

    Show all

    About

    At King Royal Garden Inn, you'll be within a 10-minute drive of Patpong Night Market and Lumpini Park. Guests can grab a bite to eat at the restaurant and visit the fitness center for a workout. Other highlights include an outdoor pool, and rooms offer deep soaking tubs and refrigerators.

    Less More
    Hotels.com

    Amenities

    • Fitness center
    • Free Wi-Fi
    • ATM on-site
    • Internet
    • Laundry service
    • Spa
    • Indoor pool
    • Outdoor pool
    • Restaurant
    • Air-conditioned
    • 24 Hour Front Desk
    • Safe
    • Storage available
    • Concierge service
    • Room service
    • Beauty salon
    • Parking
    • Non-smoking rooms available
    • Terrace/Patio
    • Business center
    • Pets not allowed
    • Designated smoking area
    Less More
    Reviews

    Guest reviews

    Overall Rating

    6.9 Good
    Based on 1,596 reviews
    • 9.1 "Terrific location."
      9.9 "Near to public transport, according to 99%."
      10.0 "100% thought it was easy to get to the train station."
      9.3 "93% liked the proximity to shopping."
      8.4 "Easily accessible by car, said 84%."
      7.8 "City centre within easy reach, said 78%."
      8.8 "88% liked the proximity to sightseeing."
    • 6.7 "Service is ok."
      5.4 "54% said the reception staff was ok."
      6.2 "Only 62% thought the service was professional."
      5.7 "Housekeeping was ok, according to 57%."
    • 6.3 "Breakfast is mediocre."
    • 5.8 "Pool is mediocre."
    • 5.1 "Rooms are ok."
    • 4.2 "Wellness & sports facilities were not very nice."
      3.1 "69% didn't like the fitness area."
    • 3.2 "Generally quite dirty."
      3.3 "67% said rooms were dirty."
      0.4 "96% said the bathroom was dirty."
      1.7 "83% thought it was rather dirty."
      3.6 "Dirty pool, said 64%."
    • 3.1 "Disappointing internet connection."
      3.1 "69% said the wifi quality was bad."
    • 1.9 "Horrible vibe."
      1.4 "86% criticized the unstylish hotel."
      0.7 "For 93%, the lobby entrance was sub-standard."
      4.0 "60% didn't like the unstylish hotel."
    View all review categories

    Overall Rating

    6.7 Good
    Based on 909 reviews
    • 9.3 "Terrific location."
      9.9 "Near to public transport, according to 99%."
      9.4 "94% liked the proximity to shopping."
      10.0 "100% thought it was easy to get to the train station."
      8.6 "Easily accessible by car, said 86%."
    • 6.8 "Service is ok."
      5.3 "53% said the reception staff was ok."
      6.6 "Only 66% thought the service was professional."
    • 6.5 "Breakfast is mediocre."
    • 5.8 "Pool is mediocre."
    • 4.8 "Rooms are not good."
      3.5 "65% said rooms were dirty."
      2.0 "80% complained about the bathroom."
      1.2 "88% thought they were poorly maintained."
      2.4 "For 76%, the rooms looked old."
      0.5 "95% said the bathroom was dirty."
      4.4 "Air conditioning was criticized by 56%."
      2.0 "80% had problems with the shower."
      2.1 "79% thought the tv was sub-standard."
      2.7 "73% criticized the small bathroom."
    • 4.3 "Wellness & sports facilities were not very nice."
      3.1 "69% didn't like the fitness area."
    • 3.3 "Not very clean."
      3.5 "65% said rooms were dirty."
      0.5 "95% said the bathroom was dirty."
      1.6 "84% thought it was rather dirty."
      3.5 "Dirty pool, said 65%."
    • 3.2 "Disappointing internet connection."
      3.2 "68% said the wifi quality was bad."
    • 2.1 "Horrible vibe."
      1.6 "84% criticized the unstylish hotel."
    View all review categories

    Overall Rating

    6.8 Good
    Based on 239 reviews
    • 8.9 "Location is great."
      9.9 "Near to public transport, according to 99%."
    • 7.1 "High comfort."
      8.6 "86% thought rooms were spacious."
    • 7.0 "Good service."
    • 6.1 "Breakfast is mediocre."
    • 5.6 "Pool is mediocre."
    • 5.3 "Rooms are ok."
    • 4.5 "Wellness & sports facilities were not very nice."
    • 3.2 "Disappointing internet connection."
      3.2 "68% said the wifi quality was bad."
    • 2.9 "Generally quite dirty."
      2.9 "71% said rooms were dirty."
      0.4 "96% said the bathroom was dirty."
    • 2.1 "Horrible vibe."
      1.6 "84% criticized the unstylish hotel."
    View all review categories

    Overall Rating

    6.9 Good
    Based on 31 reviews
    • 9.0 "Terrific location."
    • 8.5 "Good value."
    • 7.3 "High comfort."
    • 6.4 "Breakfast is mediocre."
    • 5.1 "Rooms are ok."

    Overall Rating

    7.0 Good
    Based on 414 reviews
    • 9.1 "Terrific location."
      9.9 "Near to public transport, according to 99%."
      10.0 "100% thought it was easy to get to the train station."
      8.1 "Easily accessible by car, said 81%."
    • 7.7 "High comfort."
      8.8 "88% thought rooms were spacious."
    • 7.1 "Good service."
      8.3 "83% found the staff to be very friendly."
    • 5.8 "Breakfast is mediocre."
    • 5.6 "Rooms are ok."
      6.4 "Beds were acceptable for 64%."
    • 4.2 "Wellness & sports facilities were not very nice."
    • 3.2 "Generally quite dirty."
      3.4 "66% said rooms were dirty."
      1.7 "83% thought it was rather dirty."
      0.4 "96% said the bathroom was dirty."
    • 2.9 "Disappointing internet connection."
      2.9 "71% said the wifi quality was bad."
    • 1.8 "Horrible vibe."
      1.2 "88% criticized the unstylish hotel."
    View all review categories
    Hotel type
    Solo Hotel
    Guests recommend this hotel for solo travelers.
    City Hotel
    Guests say it is the perfect hotel for a city trip.
    Good to know
    "Spacious rooms"
    data provided by TrustYou

    Recent reviews

    Photos
    Map

    Map