Overview

ibis Paris Alésia Montparnasse 14ème

49, rue des Plantes, 75014 Paris, Île-de-France, France
+33 1 53 90 40 00

$65+

Overall guest ratings

7.0/10 Good
Based on 1,232 reviews

Review highlights

  • 8.7
  • 7.5
  • 4.4
  • 4.1

Good to know

  • Comfortable beds
  • Close to public transport

Nearby

    Show all

    About

    The ibis Paris Alésia Montparnasse hotel is located in the centre of Paris, 3 km from the Exhibition Centre at Porte de Versailles, 4 km from the Latin Quarter and 5 km from the Eiffel Tower. The airport is 15 km away. The hotel has 264 air-conditioned rooms with Wifi Internet access, including 5 adapted for disabled persons, as well as 8 meeting rooms. LE RESTAURANT, a bar, snacks 24/24, and private covered parking (not free) are at your disposal. Pets accepted.

    Less More
    accorhotels.com

    Amenities

    • Free Wi-Fi
    • Facilities for Disabled Guests
    • Internet
    • Restaurant
    • Bar/Lounge
    • Air-conditioned
    • 24 Hour Front Desk
    • Storage available
    • Concierge service
    • Laundry facilities
    • Meeting/Banquet facilities
    • Pets not allowed
    • Parking (surcharge)
    Less More
    Reviews

    Guest reviews

    Overall Rating

    7.0 Good
    Based on 1,232 reviews
    • 8.7 "Location is great."
      8.9 "Near to public transport, according to 89%."
      9.4 "94% liked the proximity to shopping."
    • 7.5 "Good breakfast."
    • 7.0 "Good service."
      9.1 "91% found the staff to be very friendly."
      7.8 "78% said the reception staff was great."
      7.6 "76% thought the service was very professional."
      10.0 "100% found the restaurant service to be one of the best."
    • 6.1 "Average cleanliness."
      6.1 "Only 61% said rooms were clean enough."
      6.1 "61% thought the cleanliness of the hotel was average."
    • 5.1 "Average comfort."
      5.3 "For only 53%, the noise level was all right."
    • 4.4 "Rooms are not good."
      0.8 "92% said rooms were small."
      2.5 "75% complained about the bathroom."
      1.4 "86% thought they were poorly maintained."
      2.8 "For 72%, the rooms looked old."
      2.9 "Air conditioning was criticized by 71%."
      1.1 "89% found problems with the furniture."
      2.3 "77% said the bathroom was dirty."
      0.7 "93% criticized the small bathroom."
      4.2 "58% had problems with the shower."
      2.3 "77% thought the tv was sub-standard."
      4.5 "55% were disappointed with the minibar."
    • 4.1 "Internet is poor."
      1.9 "81% said the wifi quality was bad."
    • 3.9 "Disappointing food."
      2.2 "For 78%, the dining experience was not enjoyable."
      3.8 "62% did not enjoy the desserts."
    • 3.6 "Vibe wasn't good."
      2.3 "77% criticized the unstylish hotel."
    • 2.9 "Terrible amenities."
      2.9 "71% thought the building wasn't nice."
      1.4 "86% thought the facilities needed updating."
      4.5 "55% didn't like the architecture."
    View all review categories

    Overall Rating

    7.2 Good
    Based on 652 reviews
    • 8.6 "Location is great."
      8.9 "Near to public transport, according to 89%."
      9.3 "93% liked the proximity to shopping."
    • 7.2 "Good breakfast."
    • 7.2 "Good service."
      9.2 "92% found the staff to be very friendly."
      8.0 "80% said the reception staff was great."
      7.3 "73% thought the service was very professional."
    • 5.9 "Average value."
    • 5.8 "Average cleanliness."
      5.9 "Only 59% said rooms were clean enough."
      5.5 "55% thought the cleanliness of the hotel was average."
    • 4.6 "Rooms are not good."
      2.3 "77% complained about the bathroom."
      0.9 "91% said rooms were small."
      1.5 "85% thought they were poorly maintained."
      2.7 "Air conditioning was criticized by 73%."
      3.2 "For 68%, the rooms looked old."
      0.8 "92% criticized the small bathroom."
      1.8 "82% said the bathroom was dirty."
      0.9 "91% found problems with the furniture."
      4.6 "54% were disappointed with the minibar."
    • 4.3 "Internet is poor."
      2.3 "77% said the wifi quality was bad."
    • 4.2 "Disappointing food."
    • 3.8 "Vibe wasn't good."
      2.5 "75% criticized the unstylish hotel."
    • 2.7 "Terrible amenities."
      2.6 "74% thought the building wasn't nice."
      1.2 "88% thought the facilities needed updating."
    View all review categories

    Overall Rating

    6.8 Good
    Based on 283 reviews
    • 9.1 "Terrific location."
      9.5 "95% liked the proximity to shopping."
      9.0 "Near to public transport, according to 90%."
    • 7.6 "Good breakfast."
    • 6.8 "Service is ok."
    • 6.6 "Average cleanliness."
      6.5 "Only 65% said rooms were clean enough."
    • 5.1 "Average comfort."
      5.4 "For only 54%, the noise level was all right."
    • 4.6 "Internet is poor."
    • 4.5 "Rooms are not good."
      0.8 "92% said rooms were small."
      2.9 "71% complained about the bathroom."
      3.2 "Air conditioning was criticized by 68%."
      2.4 "For 76%, the rooms looked old."
      1.4 "86% thought they were poorly maintained."
    • 3.4 "Vibe wasn't good."
      2.1 "79% criticized the unstylish hotel."
    • 3.3 "Bad amenities."
      3.2 "68% thought the building wasn't nice."
    • 3.2 "Food is inedible."
    View all review categories

    Overall Rating

    6.6 Good
    Based on 24 reviews
    • 7.4 "Good service."
    • 4.8 "Not very comfortable."
    • 4.4 "Rooms are not good."
    • 3.8 "Disappointing food."

    Overall Rating

    7.0 Good
    Based on 271 reviews
    • 8.7 "Location is great."
      8.4 "Near to public transport, according to 84%."
    • 7.3 "Good breakfast."
    • 6.9 "Service is ok."
    • 5.6 "Average cleanliness."
      5.5 "Only 55% said rooms were clean enough."
    • 5.6 "Average value."
    • 4.8 "Not very comfortable."
      5.0 "For only 50%, the noise level was all right."
      0.8 "92% said rooms were small."
    • 4.1 "Rooms are not good."
      2.5 "75% complained about the bathroom."
      1.5 "85% thought they were poorly maintained."
      0.8 "92% said rooms were small."
      2.8 "For 72%, the rooms looked old."
      2.4 "76% said the bathroom was dirty."
      4.0 "60% had problems with the shower."
    • 4.0 "Disappointing food."
    • 3.5 "Vibe wasn't good."
      2.4 "76% criticized the unstylish hotel."
    • 2.9 "Terrible amenities."
      2.8 "72% thought the building wasn't nice."
    View all review categories
    Hotel type
    Solo Hotel
    Guests recommend this hotel for solo travelers.
    Good to know
    "Comfortable beds"
    "Close to public transport"
    data provided by TrustYou

    Photos
    Map

    Map

    Close