City Central De Luxe, Prague Hotels from $51

Guest reviews

All Reviews
Couples
Families
Business
Solo

Overall Rating

Based on 3,389 reviews

Location

8.9 "Location is great."

10.0 "Near to public transport, according to 100%."

9.5 "City centre within easy reach, said 95%."

9.2 "92% liked the proximity to sightseeing."

10.0 "100% thought it was easy to get to the train station."

7.7 "77% liked the proximity to shopping."
Value for money

6.7 "Average value."

5.5 "55% thought it was adequately priced."
Service

5.7 "Service is ok."

5.8 "Only 58% found the staff to be friendly enough."

5.0 "50% said the reception staff was ok."

5.8 "Housekeeping was ok, according to 58%."
Breakfast

5.6 "Breakfast is mediocre."
Room

4.2 "Rooms are not good."

4.4 "56% said rooms were small."

4.4 "56% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."

2.9 "Air conditioning was criticized by 71%."

1.1 "89% thought they were poorly maintained."

1.9 "For 81%, the rooms looked old."

3.2 "68% found problems with the furniture."

1.1 "89% thought the tv was sub-standard."

3.9 "61% had problems with the shower."

4.1 "59% criticized the small bathroom."

2.9 "71% were disappointed with the minibar."

1.4 "86% were unhappy with the view."

3.6 "64% were unsatisfied with the kitchenette."
Comfort

4.0 "Not very comfortable."

4.4 "56% said rooms were small."

4.4 "56% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."

2.9 "Air conditioning was criticized by 71%."

4.1 "59% thought it was too noisy."

4.1 "59% criticized the small bathroom."
Food

4.0 "Disappointing food."

3.5 "65% did not enjoy the desserts."

4.6 "54% did not like the vegetable dishes."

2.9 "For 71%, the dining experience was not enjoyable."
WiFi

3.8 "Internet is poor."

2.7 "73% said the wifi quality was bad."
Vibe

3.2 "Horrible vibe."

1.7 "83% criticized the unstylish hotel."

3.5 "For 65%, the lobby entrance was sub-standard."

View all review categories

Overall Rating

Based on 2,067 reviews

Location

8.9 "Location is great."

10.0 "Near to public transport, according to 100%."

9.5 "City centre within easy reach, said 95%."

9.1 "91% liked the proximity to sightseeing."

10.0 "100% thought it was easy to get to the train station."
Value for money

6.4 "Average value."

5.2 "52% thought it was adequately priced."
Service

5.5 "Service is ok."

5.6 "Only 56% found the staff to be friendly enough."

5.2 "52% said the reception staff was ok."

5.5 "Housekeeping was ok, according to 55%."
Breakfast

5.3 "Breakfast is mediocre."
Comfort

4.8 "Not very comfortable."

4.9 "51% said rooms were small."

4.8 "52% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."

2.9 "Air conditioning was criticized by 71%."

4.4 "56% thought it was too noisy."

4.1 "59% criticized the small bathroom."
Room

4.7 "Rooms are not good."

4.9 "51% said rooms were small."

4.8 "52% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."

2.9 "Air conditioning was criticized by 71%."

1.1 "89% thought they were poorly maintained."

1.8 "For 82%, the rooms looked old."

1.0 "90% thought the tv was sub-standard."

4.0 "60% had problems with the shower."

4.1 "59% criticized the small bathroom."

2.9 "71% were disappointed with the minibar."
Food

4.2 "Disappointing food."

3.6 "64% did not enjoy the desserts."
WiFi

3.8 "Internet is poor."

2.8 "72% said the wifi quality was bad."
Vibe

3.0 "Horrible vibe."

1.7 "83% criticized the unstylish hotel."

3.8 "For 62%, the lobby entrance was sub-standard."

View all review categories

Overall Rating

Based on 576 reviews

Location

8.9 "Location is great."

10.0 "Near to public transport, according to 100%."

9.6 "City centre within easy reach, said 96%."
Value for money

6.6 "Average value."

5.4 "54% thought it was adequately priced."
Service

5.8 "Service is ok."

5.8 "Only 58% found the staff to be friendly enough."
Breakfast

5.4 "Breakfast is mediocre."
Food

4.2 "Disappointing food."
WiFi

3.9 "Internet is poor."

2.9 "71% said the wifi quality was bad."
Room

3.6 "Rooms are not good."

5.0 "For only 50%, the bathroom was ok."

4.2 "58% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."

4.3 "57% said rooms were small."

2.7 "Air conditioning was criticized by 73%."

1.0 "90% thought they were poorly maintained."

2.1 "For 79%, the rooms looked old."
Comfort

3.5 "Not very comfortable."

4.2 "58% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."

4.3 "57% said rooms were small."

2.7 "Air conditioning was criticized by 73%."

3.8 "62% thought it was too noisy."
Vibe

3.2 "Horrible vibe."

1.8 "82% criticized the unstylish hotel."

View all review categories

Overall Rating

Based on 745 reviews

Location

9.3 "Terrific location."

10.0 "Near to public transport, according to 100%."

9.5 "City centre within easy reach, said 95%."
Value for money

7.0 "High value."

5.5 "55% thought it was adequately priced."
Service

6.2 "Service is ok."

6.2 "Only 62% found the staff to be friendly enough."

5.8 "Housekeeping was ok, according to 58%."
Breakfast

5.7 "Breakfast is mediocre."
Room

4.6 "Rooms are not good."

4.5 "55% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."

4.3 "57% said rooms were small."

4.9 "51% complained about the bathroom."

1.3 "87% thought they were poorly maintained."

3.1 "Air conditioning was criticized by 69%."

1.7 "For 83%, the rooms looked old."
Food

4.3 "Disappointing food."
Comfort

4.1 "Not very comfortable."

4.5 "55% didn't like the uncomfortable beds."

4.3 "57% said rooms were small."

3.1 "Air conditioning was criticized by 69%."

3.9 "61% thought it was too noisy."
WiFi

3.8 "Internet is poor."

2.6 "74% said the wifi quality was bad."
Vibe

3.2 "Horrible vibe."

1.6 "84% criticized the unstylish hotel."