Cons:The car was picked up by me on a dark underground parking spot, far away from the Dollar office. The documentation stated that the car had no damages. When I arrived to the car, walked around it and didn´t observe anything noticeable. That was the maximum I could reasonable do, since the light was not good enough, and I didn´t have a flashlight or was properly dressed to lie down on the floor to look thoroughly under the car. I never damaged the car in any way during my rental period. When I returned the car I was told by the Dollar staff that the car had some damages under the front bumper. The Dollar employee, laying on the floor and using a flashlight, showed to me the damage that allegedly I did during my rental: a few small blemishes on the lower part of the plastic bumper (I managed to take a picture of them). I also took a picture of the front of the car (the same normal view anyone would see when receiving the car) and it shown no noticeable damages. In other words, they were invisible for an average person. I can provide it at any time. In summary: 1. Car was on a dark spot when I received it 2. From my review, as an average person, the car seemed to be OK 3. That was the maximum I could reasonable do, since the light was not good enough, and I didn´t have a flashlight or was properly dressed to lie down on the floor to look thoroughly under the car. Does anyone do that? 4. I swear that I never damaged the car during my rental in any way 5. To my surprise, the Dollar employee using a flashlight and lying on the floor found a small damage under the front bumper. 6. I´ve never seen before this kind of flashlight car inspection when returning a car to any rental company. Were they looking for something they were aware of? 7. Bottom line: Dollar charged me 199.93 Euros (approx. 225 USD) for a damage I never did and was not responsible for. Since I never damaged the car, my guess is that the car was already damaged when I received it, and either: (i) they oversaw it in a previous inspection when returned by a prior customer, or, even worse (ii) they knew about the damage and they were just waiting for somebody like me (not taking the insurance coverage) to charge for it. The employee also confirmed that that this type of damage would only be eventually painted when the car is sold in the secondary market in the future … so, why are they charging for it? Very sad and dissapointing experience.